🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts regarding that remarks made by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents American, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to nationalism. Some disappointment was understandable. Rather, he invoked the ongoing absence of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But come on. Even if the American defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a tired Djokovic in the next round). He stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the chance to beat the three best competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite serve and concussive strength on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is often helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and grace of smaller players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot against him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a quite severe restriction on his upside.

The American has made a several significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and held the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of American men lifting grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

The American star made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's play in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the point of agony. When he finally did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to use far too much energy to prevail. Down match points in the last game, his first serve floated to heaven. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any version of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the next round and never especially seem like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed enough knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The problem is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not just express how he feels or the strategy he felt decided a match, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it forever if I fail to do it,” the American informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {