🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.