🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a law raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," commented one parliamentarian driving the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust research".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who was lost after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and suitable for children," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the regional government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws mandating adult authorization for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from some individuals to mimic the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, further states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve user protection.

Even as this international discussion continues, the actions of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.